logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.08.11 2016고단1790
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and a fine of one hundred thousand won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On April 15, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 6 million won by obstructing the performance of official duties at the Daegu District Court on December 11, 2007; a fine of 1.5 million won by the same court on July 23, 2004; a fine of 1.5 million won by obstructing the performance of special official duties at the same court on July 23, 2004; and a fine of 7 million won by obstructing the performance of official duties at the same court on November 26, 199.

[Criminal facts]

1. Violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act;

A. On March 27, 2016, at around 03:50 on March 27, 2016, the Defendant: (a) arrived at the destination of the victim C having been operating on the road in front of the Gandong Police Station, Gandong-gun; (b) but (c) did not pay KRW 72,900 of the taxi fee without justifiable grounds.

B. On March 27, 2016, the Defendant, at around 05:50 on March 27, 2016, committed anless act in the “G cafeteria” operated by the Victim F in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, by failing to pay the price without justifiable grounds, by putting the bones of 7,000 won or more at the market price.

2. On March 27, 2016, the Defendant was arrested in the crime of violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act on the ground that he was arrested in the crime of violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act on the ground that he was found to have denied residence by the police officer I, etc., on the ground that he was arrested in the crime of violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act on the ground that he was able to take a bath to the said I, and that he was fluord to the said I and that he was fluord to the said I on the breast-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, upon receiving 112 reports that the Defendant got on a non-standing son, he was asked from the police officer I of the H District of the Daegu-gu Police Station, who was called out after receiving the notification.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the handling of 112 reported cases by police officers and legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. A written statement of C and F [the current criminal may be arrested by any person without a warrant (Article 212 of the Criminal Procedure Act), a maximum amount of not more than five hundred thousand won, detention, or a minor fine] shall be the criminal.

arrow