The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

At the time of each of the instant crimes, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol so as to have no or weak ability to discern things or make decisions.

The lower court’s sentence of unfair sentencing (one year of imprisonment, one year of confiscation No. 1) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

According to the records on the assertion of mental disorder, even though the defendant was in a drunken state at the time of each of the crimes in this case, in light of the following circumstances, such as the course and process of the crime in this case, means and method, and the defendant's speech and behavior before and after the crime, the defendant was unable to discern things or make decisions due to drinking.

Since it seems that the defendant was in a state or weak condition, the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

It is advantageous that the defendant's wrong determination on the argument of unfair sentencing is recognized, and that the defendant has agreed with the victims of interference with business.

However, there is a record that the defendant was punished more than 20 times for the same violent crime, including punishment, and therefore, it is a crime during the repeated crime period. In particular, the crime of Paragraph 2 of the holding of the court below is disadvantageous in light of the circumstances that the crime of this case was committed with a deadly weapon and interfere with duties, and other various sentencing conditions specified in the arguments of this case such as the background of the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, etc., the defendant's argument is not justified.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

However, the judgment of the court below No. 1-B.

Article 25 of the Regulations on Criminal Procedure is clear that the “crime against Victim F”, which is the coordinate of the evidence, is a clerical error in the police statement against P, and each police statement against the F, among the summary of the evidence, is a clerical error in the statement of the police against P.