beta
Text
Defendant
A and B Imprisonment with prison labor for a short term of three years and two years and six months, Defendant C's imprisonment for a term of three years and six months, and Defendant D for a term of three years.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2015Gohap87]
1. Defendant A and B offered money under the name of “where a dispute arises with male and female juveniles, they shall be protected” from female juveniles who are female juveniles engaged in commercial sex acts: G (W, 16 years of age), and H (n, 15 years of age) to receive money under the pretext of “where a dispute arises with male and female juveniles, they shall be protected.”
Accordingly, from the early April 2015 to the early April 2015, Defendant A and B recruited a man by using the “lostopon fishing fluor” in the studio located in the 1stm of Seocho-si, and making the said female female female female female female female female sexual intercourse with sexual intercourse and receive KRW 1.50,000 won per time from the method of receiving KRW 50,000,000 among them as the protection expenses, and received KRW 1,50,000 as the protection expenses, by arranging the above female female female female sexual intercourses over 30 times in total.
As a result, Defendant A and B conspiredd with others for business purposes to arrange to buy sex for unspecified men.
2. On April 2015, Defendant A concluded that Defendant A will independently operate the same partnership with Defendant B while arranging the business relationship with Defendant B, and, from around that time to around April 2015, Defendant A arranged the sex of G to purchase 15 times through the same method as that set forth in paragraph (1) in the Ludio in the first place in the racing city from around that time to around April 2015, and received KRW 750,000 from G as a protection expense.
As a result, Defendant A, for business purposes, assisted unspecified men to purchase sex of juveniles.
3. Defendant B, on April 2015, concluded that Defendant B would independently operate a partnership with Defendant A while using the racing telecom, etc. as an office from around that time to around April 2015, Defendant B purchased 20 times through 20 times in the same manner as described in paragraph (1).