1. The plaintiffs' lawsuits are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. The gist of the Plaintiffs’ assertion was that only 240 households among the 1,3,4,6, 7, 8, and 9 constituency 450 households were held in the election of the representative of each Dong-gu G apartment building in Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, which was conducted from July 3, 2017 to July 7, 2017, and that the visit voting was held, and that the election management members recommended to vote to a specific candidate in the course of visiting voting, the Plaintiffs asserted that the Defendant, the chairman of the election management commission, was seeking confirmation of the invalidity of the said election.

2. The defendant's defense prior to the merits against the defendant, who is not the council of occupants' representatives, or the chairperson of the election management committee, is unlawful to dispute the invalidation of elections of representatives by buildings.

On the other hand, seeking confirmation of the invalidity of the resolution of election of representatives by buildings is ultimately a dispute over the qualification of members of the council of occupants' representatives, and thus, the council of occupants' representatives has the standing to be the defendant in the lawsuit seeking confirmation of invalidity of the resolution (Supreme Court Decision 2006Da86597 Decided September 25, 2008), and even if the defendant who is an individual files a lawsuit against the defendant and obtains a favorable judgment, its validity cannot be said to affect the council of occupants' representatives, and therefore, it cannot be the most effective and appropriate method as a means of resolving the dispute between the parties surrounding the validity of the above election. Thus, the lawsuit against the plaintiffs against the defendant cannot be the most effective way

3. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices, since the plaintiffs' lawsuit of this case is unlawful.