A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On January 31, 2018, at around 23:30 on the front side of the C Building, the Defendant: (a) was in sight with the victim D (30 tax) and parking problems; (b) was scking the victim’s head head by kneing the victim’s head; (c) was sckeing the victim’s face with drinking and knenee, and suffered injury, such as the combination of the left side of the victim, the combination of the knee and the knee, which require treatment for about 56 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police against E or D;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. A damaged photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to CCTV screen CDs for crime prevention, investigation reports (a statement related to the current situation at the time D and the submission of USB);

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 59 of the Act on the Protection and Observation of Social Service Orders;

1. Application of the sentencing criteria [Scope of Recommendation] General Injury to Type 1 (General Injury): In cases where the victim is fully responsible for the occurrence of a crime or the expansion of damage to the victim (special mitigation) in the basic area (4 months to one year and six months) (special mitigation) / In cases of serious injury (one and four types);

2. As a result of the instant crime committed by the Defendant, the victimized party was forced to suffer physical and economic damage, such as not going to work for the company after an operation after general anesthesia, due to the Defendant’s criminal act of this case.

The victim is also likely to cause a future legacy due to damage to the left-hand niversal nives.

After the instant case, the Defendant did not recover the damage to the victim, either solely with respect to death or injury.

The Defendant had been punished twice due to the violation of the Road Traffic Act, and had sufficient opportunity to become aware of his abnormal behavior during drinking, but committed the instant crime. However, the Defendant recognized and opposed to the instant crime.

The victim and E put the victim to a vision with the defendant due to parking problems, and the victim also had the defendant.