A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Seized evidence subparagraph 1 shall be forfeited from the accused.

Punishment of the crime

On January 28, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for a violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment of Violence, Etc. (Habitual Violence) at the Gwangju High Court of Gwangju on three years, and on May 23, 2016, the Defendant was subject to a decision of family protective disposition for remaining assault at the net support of the Gwangju Family Court of Gwangju on eight occasions.

1. Around July 27, 2016, the Defendant was able to drink the victim’s left right side side side and left side side side side of the victim’s laund on the ground that the victim D (the father aged 62) who is his father in Macheon-si, Macheon-si (the father aged 62) did not have the drinking value in the Elaundry site operated by the victim D (the father aged 62) on July 27, 2016.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually committed violence against his lineal ascendant.

2. The Defendant threatened the victim with intimidation of special lineal ascendant [2016 Godan1431] at the aforementioned temporary location, and with the victim’s face value, which is a dangerous thing on the phishing, continuously avoiding disturbance, and threatening “if only a parent is not a parent, fin away.”

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened his lineal ascendant.

3. On July 20, 2016, around 22:30, the Defendant: (a) performed official duties of obstruction of performance of official duties (2016No. 1851); (b) within G 101-dong 402, G, the Defendant’s residence in Hacheon-si, Hacheon-si; and (c) on the ground that the circumstances leading up to H of the Net Police Station H, dispatched after receiving the Defendant’s report to assault D’s residence, he saw the Defendant to listen to the statements of the said D; and (d) assaulted the I by cutting down the breath, which he stored.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning criminal investigations by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of statement to D or I by the police;

1. Evidential photographs of each evidence;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Criminal records and investigation reports (verification of the records of the same kind of crime);

1. Habituality of judgment: The defendant's criminal records and the crime of the same kind of crime are repeated for a considerable period of time, etc., recognition of dampness is recognized;