1. The Defendant’s KRW 146,334,845 for the Plaintiff and KRW 6% per annum from October 19, 2013 to November 28, 2014, respectively, shall be the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. From September 16, 2006, the Plaintiff is a person engaged in manufacturing industrial machinery with the trade name “D” in the Gyeongdong-gun, Chungcheongnambuk-gun, and the Defendant is a person who engages in manufacturing industrial machinery with the trade name “F” from September 3, 2009 to the Gyeongdong-gun, Gyeongdong-gun, Gyeongdong-gun, the Defendant is a person who engages in manufacturing industrial machinery.

B. On March 19, 2012, with respect to the supply of goods and the installation work of a provisional order and a compact Lbling (hereinafter “instant machinery”) between G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G”), the Plaintiff written a contract (i.e., document No. 1; hereinafter “instant contract”) with a contractor by June 30, 2012, setting the contract amount of KRW 740,000 (excluding value-added tax); and (ii) the Defendant is a joint and several surety under the instant contract.

After the conclusion of the contract of this case, the plaintiff was sent by the defendant that G would directly produce the smoke connected to the exhaust panty among the machinery of this case, and the cost of manufacturing the machinery of this case was changed to KRW 730,000,000 upon the plaintiff's consent.

C. Around July 2012, the Plaintiff completed the manufacture of the instant machinery and delivered it to G. D.

The Defendant received the cost of manufacturing the instant machinery from G and paid the Plaintiff, and the Defendant paid KRW 496,598,130 to the Plaintiff by October 20, 2012.

The price for materials purchased by the Plaintiff from the Defendant for the manufacture of the instant machinery is KRW 108,460,000.

E. On June 30, 2012, the Plaintiff issued, respectively, a tax invoice stating the amount of KRW 650,000,000 to the Defendant, and the tax invoice stating the amount of KRW 200,000,000 on October 20, 2012.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 2, Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion;

A. After concluding a contract for the manufacture of the instant machinery with G around March 2012, the Defendant concluded a contract for the manufacture of the instant machinery with G, and on April 1, 2012, the contract price of the Plaintiff and the instant machinery was 740,000.