1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff and C are legally married couple who completed the marriage report on February 20, 1971.

B. The registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of C with respect to each of the instant real estate. However, the Daejeon District Court’s budget registry office was received on January 8, 2015, and the registration of ownership transfer added the Defendant to a joint owner (hereinafter “instant registration of ownership transfer”) was completed.

[Reasons for Recognition] Evidence No. 1-1, 2, and Evidence No. 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment that the defendant added C to the co-ownership of each real estate of this case without regard to the plaintiff, asserts that C should implement the procedure for cancellation registration of ownership transfer registration of this case.

However, the Plaintiff did not present any legal grounds for seeking cancellation of the ownership transfer registration of this case.

(A) The Plaintiff’s assertion to the effect that the cause of the registration of the transfer of ownership in this case is null and void (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 79Da741, Jun. 26, 1979). Furthermore, even if the Plaintiff’s assertion was made to the effect that the cause of the registration of the transfer of ownership in this case is null and void (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 79Da741, Jun. 26, 1979); there is insufficient evidence to acknowledge the cause of invalidation.

Therefore, the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

3. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.