logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.10.04 2017고단6368
전자금융거래법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Except as otherwise expressly provided for in any other Act, no person of the 2017 Highest 6368 shall lend or lend any access medium with the receipt, demand or promise of compensation.

Nevertheless, at around 17:00 on July 11, 2017, the Defendant promised to receive KRW 1.5 million per unit in return for lending the account to be used for reducing or exempting cosmetic company tax from his/her name in front of the Defendant’s office located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, to receive KRW 1.5 million per unit in return for the lending of the account to be used for reducing or exempting cosmetic company tax from his/her name, and lent the access media to Kwikset service article who sent three copies of the physical card connected to the name of the Defendant’s post office account (Account Number: D), personal compromise account (Account Number: E), and Suhyup account (F).

The Defendant of “2017 Highest 7068”, on January 25, 2017, at the “H” office operated by the Defendant of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 1321, the Defendant: (a) prepared a “domestic (foreign) travel contract with the victim as an agent for both air tickets, hotels, etc. in connection with the new marriage travel on January 19, 2017; and (b) received KRW 2,400,000 from the victim of the same day as the Defendant’s account in the name of the victim; (c) received KRW 1,00,000,000 on January 25, 2017; and (d) transferred the amount of KRW 20,000,000 on March 21, 2017; and (e) transferred the amount of KRW 80,000,000 on April 39, 2017;

However, at the time, the Defendant had already failed to properly deal with other marriage-based and new travel-based reservations, and had to return money to the Defendant, and had been urged to pay the unpaid money from the customer, and it was thought that the Defendant was to receive the above money from the victim to be used for debt repayment, etc., as above, the Defendant did not make a false statement to the victim, and as such, 7,680.

arrow