The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (limited to imprisonment for eight months, suspension of execution for two years, probation, and community service for 120 hours) declared by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case committed the crime of this case is a favorable circumstance such as the defendant's acknowledgement of all of the crimes of this case and reflection against all of the crimes of this case, when the defendant was able to take the face of victim F by drinking, and the victim was satisfing the body of the inside and floor requiring eight weeks medical treatment.

However, the court below's punishment is within the scope of the above recommendation, and the defendant's age, character and environment, family relationship, circumstances leading to the defendant's crime of this case, and all of the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and environment, family relationship, circumstances leading to the defendant's criminal act of this case, and the victim sought a strict punishment, and the defendant has a record of being punished several times in the past. As a result of the application of the sentencing guidelines of the Sentencing Commission of the Supreme Court, the recommendation type for the crime of this case is within the scope of the above recommendation type as a result of the application of the sentencing guidelines of the Sentencing Commission of the Supreme Court. The defendant's argument is without merit because it is too unreasonable to consider all the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.