1. For the plaintiffs:

A. Defendant D is a registry office of Seoul Eastern District Court on Apr. 2, 2010 with respect to real estate stated in the attached list.

1. Determination as to the claim against Defendant D

(a)as shown in the reasons for the attachment of the claim;

(The plaintiff withdrawn the lawsuit against the co-defendant E in this case). (B)

Article 208 (Civil Procedure Act No. 3)

2. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings as to the claims against the Defendant Seoul Special Metropolitan City’s evidence Nos. 1 and 5, the facts identical to the entry of the cause of the claim in the annexed sheet can be acknowledged, and no counter-proof exists

According to the above facts, Defendant D is obligated to implement the procedure for cancellation registration of the registration of the right to lease on a deposit basis stated in the order to the plaintiffs, and Defendant Seoul Special Metropolitan City, a third party who has interests in the register, is obligated to express his consent to the plaintiffs with regard to the cancellation registration of the right

3. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are justified, and all of them are accepted. It is so decided as per Disposition.