logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.12.14 2016노1535
보안관찰법위반
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., a fine of one million won) of the lower court is too unfilled and unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case, which is determined by the court below, is a case where the defendant, as a person subject to security observation, has a duty to report the major activities, etc. between three months in accordance with the relevant laws and regulations to the chief of the police station having jurisdiction over his/her domicile, but the nature of the crime is not less and less than that of the crime, and the defendant has already been subject to criminal punishment

On the other hand, the fact relevance itself related to the crime of this case is recognized, and the fact that the economic situation of the defendant seems difficult, etc. are favorable to the defendant.

In full view of the aforementioned circumstances and other factors of sentencing, including the background of the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment, etc., as seen above, the lower court’s punishment is too uneasible and unreasonable. Therefore, the Prosecutor’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow