The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is as follows: although the Defendant had no insultd the victim, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case; thus, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the defendant was in and around the date and place of the decision of the court below.

D She listened by the victim, ‘this Chewing year, I am la, I am.'

The term “this year” and “this Chewing year” can be acknowledged as a fact of openly insulting the victim by referring the victim to “Iskyline” and “Iskin.”

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition (Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with the summary of the evidence in the judgment of the court below (Article 15(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the “written statement” in the judgment of the court below is a clerical error in the pertinent Article of the Act and the choice of punishment as to the facts constituting the crime of 1. and Article 15(1) of the Act on the Punishment of Criminal Procedure on the ground that it is obvious that the “written statement” in the judgment of the court below was omitted by this error (Article 311 of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that it is corrected and added ex officio pursuant to Article 2