logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2017.08.24 2017구합62242
영업정지처분취소
Text

1. The Defendant’s business suspension disposition against the Plaintiff on April 17, 2017 shall be revoked for one month.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 31, 2016, the Plaintiff posted the instant notice, such as attached Table 1, on the Plaintiff’s official B, etc., as “C,” the Plaintiff’s title, “B,” etc., selling the same products via its website (hereinafter “instant product”).

B. The Defendant, among the instant notices, indicated that “HPMC” such as gymylproethyl ether (HPMC) is a substance with a risk of cancer in the U.S. when he or she takes in excess of fluorite, that “culs, cluorine fluorine cluorine cluorine cluorine cluorum cluorum cluorum cluorum cluorum cluorum cluorum cluorum cluorum cluorum cluorum cluorum cluorum cluorum cluorum cluorum cluorum cluorum cluorum cluorum cluorum cluorum cluorum cluorum cluorum cluorum cluorum cluorum cluorum cluorum c.

C. The Plaintiff, who is dissatisfied with the above disposition, filed an administrative appeal with the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Administrative Appeals Commission, but dismissed.

On April 17, 2017, the Defendant again set the period of suspension of business from May 8, 2017 to June 6, 2017 and made a disposition of suspension of business for one month (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 through 5, purport of whole pleadings.

arrow