logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.10.24 2016나18934
공사대금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

Since the plaintiff asserts that the defendant's appeal for subsequent completion is unlawful, the plaintiff's appeal for subsequent completion of appeal of this case is examined as to the legality of the appeal of this case.

1. The plaintiff, on March 3, 2016, filed an application for a payment order with the defendant company, which is a stock company, to the above defendant company, at the place of service D and 201 of Yeonsu-gu Incheon (hereinafter "the domicile of this case"), and the above application for the payment order served by the above court to the domicile of this case was received by N in the qualification of the defendant company's "Liwon". On March 29, 2016, the above application for the payment order was served by the defendant company as the defendant company's "Liwon". The above case was served by the defendant company as the lawsuit, the first instance court received all documents related to the lawsuit, such as a duplicate of the legal brief and the date for pleading, or the above 20th court received the original copy as the qualification of the defendant company's "Liwonwon" and the "place of work", and the defendant company's representative director was served as the defendant company's 10th, 2010 and notified as the date for pleading 16th, 16th.

2. The defendant's assertion and the original copy of the judgment of the court of first instance.

arrow