logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.11.26 2018나77029
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the part concerning the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for any additional determination as follows.

2. The Plaintiff asserts to the effect that the term of the instant lease agreement is legitimate by up to four years from May 9, 2017, which is the contract term under the agreement between the parties, since there was no intention to renew the said lease agreement, and the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act is a discretionary provision. However, Article 10(2) of the former Commercial Building Lease Protection Act provides that “The lessee’s right to request renewal of the lease may be exercised only within the extent of five years, including the initial term of the lease.” (amended by Act No. 15791, Oct. 16, 2018; the said provision was amended by Act No. 15791, Oct. 16, 2018; however, the said provision was extended by up to 10 years from the first 6th 7th 10th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 4th 5th 5th 10th 5th 5th 10th 5th 5th 20th 5th 20.

arrow