logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2018.12.11 2018가단1907
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 20,206,304 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from July 20, 2017 to December 11, 2018; and (b) for the Plaintiff.

Reasons

At around 03:00 on July 19, 2017, the Defendant: (a) the Plaintiff, who was working for the above women, was dissatisfied with the nameless female (E) in the vicinity of the D cafeteria located in Yasan-si, Yasan-si, had the Plaintiff be faced with the Plaintiff’s head head at the floor by pushing the Plaintiff’s upper part; (b) the Defendant, who again caused the Plaintiff’s chest, was fluoring the Plaintiff’s chest at around 4 weeks of medical treatment; and (c) caused the Plaintiff’s injury, such as the escape of the fluor on the left-hand side of the music line, which requires approximately 4 weeks of medical treatment.

(hereinafter “instant harmful act.” As a result, the Plaintiff received hospital treatment from the F Hospital from July 19, 2017 to August 14, 2017, and hospital treatment from August 16, 2017 to August 21, 2017, respectively. The Plaintiff received hospital treatment from the original dental university hospital from the original dental university hospital from July 19, 2017 to the hospital from February 7, 2018.

On October 17, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for six months in imprisonment with prison labor in the Jeonju District Court’s Gunsan Branch (2018 Godan732) as a result of the above crime of injury due to the above crime.

On October 24, 2018, the defendant appealed to the Jeonju District Court 2018No1517 on October 24, 2018 and is currently pending in the appellate court.

[Ground of recognition] According to the above facts as to Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4 through 14, and 17 (including the number of branches), and the purport of the whole pleadings, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for damages caused by the harmful act of this case as a tort.

As the plaintiff did not engage in economic activities for six months due to the defendant's illegal acts, the plaintiff asserts that he/she has a duty to compensate for the lost income of the amount equivalent to the daily wage of the ordinary worker for the above period.

In other words, the Plaintiff’s scams, scams, and scams, such as the fall on the right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand, due to the instant harmful act.

arrow