logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.04.05 2017나2044917
매매대금
Text

1. The defendants' appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as follows, and this case is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since the reasoning for the court’s explanation is the same as the ground for the judgment of the court of first instance except the following parts.

2. On the fourth part of the judgment of the court of first instance, the phrase “the copy of the complaint of this case” (hereinafter referred to as “the copy of the complaint of this case”) shall be as follows.

After the delivery of a copy of the complaint of this case, Defendant A, who is attached to the day of the delivery, is obligated to pay damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum from January 29, 2016 to the day of full payment, and from January 28, 2016 to the day of full payment to January 28, 2016 to the day of full payment.

3. The plaintiff's claim against the defendants shall be accepted on the ground of its reasoning. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning the damages for delay against the defendant Eul is unfair since it has accepted less than the amount cited by this court, but only the defendants appealed, so it cannot be modified disadvantageously against the defendant Eul who is the appellant in accordance with the principle of prohibition of disadvantageous alteration. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the defendant Gap among the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion. Thus, the defendants' appeal is dismissed in its entirety as it is without merit

arrow