A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 18:20 on October 4, 2019, the Defendant: (a) received a report from 112, stating that “I have any abnormal people; and (b) I wish to ask questions about the details of the report from D in the circumstances belonging to the Dongdong Police Station C District, which was called to the site; (c) asked him/her about the details of the report; (d) he/she took off from the said D; and (d) asked him/her about whether I will am son; and (d) I would like to ask him/her about the accurate site of the instant case. I tried to find him/her about how I will am son; and (d) I would like to find him/her and son son son son son son son son son son, son son son son son son son son son son, etc.; and (e) to close the on-site dispatch of the said D and to get on the vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the statement of victim to D;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that it reflects the fact, the fact that the criminal record of the same kind was committed once, but has long been used, and the extent of the power exercised is not much serious);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;