1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 27, 2003, the Plaintiff was discharged from military service after entering the Army, and was discharged from military service on February 25, 2005.

B. On February 13, 2006, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of persons who rendered distinguished services to the State with respect to the Defendant, claiming that the Plaintiff caused “persons who rendered distinguished services to the State” during military service, but the Defendant rendered a decision on May 16, 2006 on the non-applicable requirements for persons who rendered distinguished services to the State.

C. On September 24, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of persons of distinguished service to the State with respect to the assertion that the Plaintiff, who was involved in cruel acts, such as the beta of a volunteer soldier, committed during the military service, had an officially opened in all military unit life, and caused depression and apprehensions, and that “mental disorder, mental disorder, mental disorder, and chronic disability caused by mental illness” (hereinafter “the instant award”).

On March 25, 2015, following the deliberation and resolution of the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement, the Defendant rendered a decision on the eligibility of persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State and persons eligible for veteran’s compensation on the ground that the instant wounds were not recognized to have been caused or aggravated due to military performance or education and training (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Reasons for Recognition] Evidence No. 1, Evidence No. 2-1, and Evidence No. 2-2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The plaintiff's assertion is that the plaintiff was unable to properly adapt to the closed military life under strict regulations and control, and he was subject to bullying and harsh treatment from the same sergeant, and was openly forced to suffer from a mental fission as it was open to the military life, and the mental fission was rapidly aggravated due to the lack of appropriate treatment.

Therefore, even if there is a proximate causal relation between the Plaintiff’s military service and the instant difference, the instant disposition otherwise determined is unlawful.

(b)each entry of the certificate Nos. 4, 5, and 6 in the board and this Court;