The punishment against the Defendants shall be provided for in six months by imprisonment.

However, the Defendants are two years from the date of the final judgment of this case.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a male-friendly person of C, and the defendant B is a used vehicle with the driver, and the defendant B is a person who has become aware of it through the defendant A and the Face North.

Defendant

On December 2, 2018, A proposed that “I want to purchase the second class of the second class of the vehicle with a loan,” “I would receive a loan in the name of C and would pay the second class of the vehicle in the first class of the vehicle,” and C consented thereto, and “I would have contacted Defendant B who is a used vehicle with a used vehicle drawingr, and “I would be allowed to obtain a loan more than the vehicle price” from Defendant B, and I would have C obtain a loan in excess of the actual vehicle price, and the Defendants conspired to divide it among them.

On December 17, 2018, the Defendants made a false statement to C within the boundaries of the port located in the 394-ro of the north-gu Office at the port from the north-gu Office at the port to the end of December 17, 2018, “A vehicle price is KRW 429 million, and a vehicle price is KRW 4,29 million, so a loan should be obtained in an amount equal to that amount.” The Defendants made C, without knowledge of the circumstances, obtain a loan equivalent to KRW 42,90,000 from the victim E corporation as the vehicle price.

However, in fact, the above NV market price was approximately KRW 26,80,000, and the excess loans received from the injured party were considered to have been divided by the above public offering.

Ultimately, the Defendants deceiving the victim as above and received KRW 42.9 million from the victim’s injury to the Defendant’s account under C’s name on December 17, 2018 and deposited KRW 42.9 million into the Defendant’s management account. Defendant B transferred KRW 16.1 million remaining after purchasing the above vehicle to the Agricultural Cooperative under the name of Defendant B, and then remitted KRW 3.6 million out to Defendant A.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to induce the victim to receive property by deceiving C, but the indictment states that “the victim was taken by deceiving the victim and receiving property,” but corrected.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ each.