The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On August 28, 2019, Nonparty deceased C (hereinafter “the Deceased”) appealed from the emergency room of D Hospital operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) with difficulty in respiratory treatment, etc.

(b) In the event that an increase in ST Section C of the same date increases as a result of the examination of the depth of the deceased on the same day, it may be suspected of acute emulgment, etc.

In addition, when the depth is destroyed as a result of blood examination, the CK-MB value with a concentration increase and Tropon value much higher than the normal range, medical professionals in the defendant hospital implemented the cardio-cerebral clific clific clific clific clific clific clific clific clific clific clific clific clific clific clific clifics in the same day.

(c)

However, it was not found that the result of the cardio-cerebrovascular surgery had not been found that there was a significant compromise in the ornamental East, and the medical professionals at the Defendant Hospital diagnosed the symptoms of the deceased as “the so-called stress cardio-cerebral disease.”

(d)

Since then, the deceased was hospitalized in the Defendant hospital on the same day, and continued to receive medication for acute heart therapy, but died on September 1, 2019.

E. The deceased’s heir has three children, including the plaintiff.

[Grounds for Recognition: Evidence No. 1, Evidence No. 2-2, Evidence No. 5, and the purport of the whole pleadings]

2. Determination

A. The medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital asserted by the Plaintiff suspected of having been in the emergency room at the time of the deceased’s birth, and started active treatment.

Even though the deceased was discharged as they were, the time of treatment for the heart was set and caused the death of the deceased.

In addition, unlike the diagnosis on the part of the defendant hospital, the deceased seems to have died of the heart due to the “survelary heart infection by virus” rather than the “surlic heart disease”. Thus, due to the above erroneous initial diagnosis, an appropriate treatment is to take place between the heart and the heart.