logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2015.08.26 2015고단521
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 7, 2015, the Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act: (a) around 12:00, at around 17:55 on the same day, operated the Done Star Co., Ltd. owned by the Defendant, who did not purchase mandatory insurance from around 37 km to the front day of the Won-si, around 17:55 on the same day.

2. Around 17:55 on June 7, 2015, the Defendant driving the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol content 0.135% of the blood alcohol concentration, from the vicinity of the half-dog of the original city to the front day of the original city, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol at approximately 4km from the half-dog of the original city to the front day of the original city.

3. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car with the above Lone Star under the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and the Road Traffic Act;

The Defendant driven the foregoing vehicle under the influence of alcohol, as described in paragraph (2), and proceeded with the first line road in front of C at the time of the prime week, with the direction of the right to use the road on the side of the door.

Since the Fbeh or No. 60 years old driving is proceeding in front of the Defendant’s automobile, there was a duty of care to pay attention to the state of the vehicle in front and to prevent the accident in advance by driving safely while maintaining a safe distance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded without stopping to turn to the left at the same time while it is difficult for the Defendant to drive the car normally due to influence of drinking, and the part of the Defendant’s driver’s driver’s driver’s driver’s driver’s license and driver’s driver’s license and driver’s license and driver’s license and driver’s license and driver’s license.

The Defendant, by its occupational negligence, suffered injury, such as “brain sugar,” which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment to the above victim E, and injury, such as “brain sugar,” which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment to the victim G (34 years of age) who is a passenger of the said beer or car, respectively. The Defendant suffered on the part of the victim E, approximately 3,523 of repair expenses, such as exchange of merpos, on the above beer or car owned by the victim E.

arrow