logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2019.10.02 2019고단1486
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power】 On April 20, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Gwangju District Court’s net support on April 20, 2012, and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 4 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act from November 29, 2016 to the same support.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Although the Defendant was punished for driving under the influence of alcohol twice as above, at around 12:40 on June 16, 2019, the Defendant driven a DNA rocketing car with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.120% from the section of approximately 2.7 km up to the credit of the Dong-dong post office located in the two east-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-si, in a state of under the influence of alcohol by 0.120%.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury) and the Road Traffic Act (Non-accident after Accidents) are those engaged in driving a rocketing car;

On June 16, 2019, at around 12:40, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol, and led the two-lane road in front of the Dong post office located in the two-lane, Dong-dong at the time of leisure, along the two-lane road from the E store room to the national post office of Dong-dong.

At the time, at the front of the defendant, the victim F (the 60-year-old) was stopped according to the GG car stop signal driven by the victim F (the 60-year-old). In this case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately operating the steering gear and brakes by maintaining the distance between the front vehicle and the front vehicle in order to prevent accidents.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and passed the car as it was due to negligence, and received the following part of the vehicle behind the franchise as the front part of the other car.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence as above, and at the same time, 672,516 won, such as the exchange of pans, etc.

arrow