1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the Plaintiff’s KRW 22,00,000 against the Defendant and its related thereto from April 10, 2019 to March 19, 2021.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court on this part of the facts admitted is as stated in Paragraph 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this part of the judgment is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

가. 당사자의 주장 1) 원고의 주장 피고는 이 사건 임대차계약 체결을 중개할 당시 원고에게 이 사건 임차목적 물이 미 등기 상태 임을 알려주지 아니한 채 이 사건 임차 목적물이 아닌 이 사건 G 호의 등기부 등본과 건축물 대장을 보여주면서 중개 대상물 확인 설명서의 확인 설명 근거자료 부분 ‘ 등기사항 증명서’ 란에 ‘∨’ 표시를 하고, 건축물 대장 상 위반 건축물 여부의 ‘ 적 법’ 란에 ‘∨’ 표시를 하여 이를 교부하는 등 중개 대상 물의 확인 설명의무를 다하지 못하였다.

Due to such breach of the Defendant’s duty of care, the Plaintiff was unable to participate in the auction procedure of this case even though the lessor was unable to receive the lease deposit from the lessor D, and the lease deposit could not be distributed.

Therefore, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for damages equivalent to the deposit amount of lease that the plaintiff suffered.

2) At the time of entering into the instant lease agreement, the Defendant breached his duty of care in mediating the Plaintiff by clearly informing the Plaintiff that the object of the instant lease is unregistered.

In addition, the Plaintiff’s failure to receive the security deposit during the auction procedure of this case is due to the Plaintiff’s negligence and thus, there is no relation between the Plaintiff’s damage and the Defendant’s intermediary act.

B. Upon receipt of a request for brokerage, the judgment broker shall confirm the location and relationship of the object of brokerage before the completion of brokerage and explain accurately to the brokerage client who intends to acquire the right to the object of brokerage, and shall provide relevant evidentiary materials, such as a certified copy of the land ledger and a certificate of registered matters.