All appeals are dismissed.

1. Defendant C’s appeal is examined.

Defendant

C did not submit a statement of grounds for appeal within the statutory period, and the petition of appeal does not contain any indication in the grounds for appeal.

2. Defendant B’s grounds of appeal are examined.

According to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a more minor sentence has been imposed on Defendant B, the argument that the amount of punishment is unreasonable is not

3. Defendant D’s grounds of appeal are examined (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed).

The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly admitted by the court of first instance, the court below was just in finding Defendant D guilty of violation of the Medical Service Act among the facts charged in this case on the grounds as stated in its holding, and it did not err by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations and by misapprehending the legal principles of logic and experience and by exceeding the bounds of the free evaluation of evidence.

In addition, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment with or without labor for more than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a more minor sentence has been imposed on Defendant D, the argument that the amount of punishment is unreasonable is not a

4. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.