1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has concluded an automobile insurance contract with respect to the automobile C (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), with respect to the automobile D (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

B. On November 28, 2017, the driver of the Plaintiff’s vehicle: (a) around 19:06, and around 19:06, the driver of the Plaintiff’s vehicle moved the said road without permission (hereinafter “victim”) in the front left side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle (hereinafter “the first accident”); and (b) the Defendant’s vehicle driving on the opposite lane took the victim into the front left side of the Defendant’s vehicle and took the victim into the front left side of the vehicle (hereinafter “the second accident”); and (c) the victim died of the said accident (hereinafter “the instant accident”).

C. On February 28, 2018, the Plaintiff paid KRW 73,000,000 to the deceased E’s heirs as damages, etc.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4 through 8, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

가. 원고의 주장 이 사건 사고는 야간에 운전하면서 전방주시의무를 다하지 아니하여 무단횡단하던 피해자를 피하지 못하여 충격한 원고 차량 운전자의 과실과, 야간에 전방주시의무를 게을리하여 자신의 진행차로로 튕겨 들어온 피해자를 피하지 못하여 충격한 피고 차량 운전자의 과실이 경합하여 발생한 것이고, 사고 발생 경위 등에 비추어 보면 피고 차량의 과실 비율을 50%로 봄이 상당하고, 원고가 자신의 출재로 피고 측을 면책시켰으므로, 피고는 원고에게 위 지급된 손해배상금 중 피고 차량의 과실비율에 해당하는 36,500,000원(73,000,000원 × 50%)을 구상금으로 지급할 의무가 있다.

b. (1) The victim who illegally crosses the opposite lane other than his own running lane to the driver of the motor vehicle without permission is the opposite lane.