logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.11.10 2016노1141
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (fines 7,00,000) is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The fact that the instant traffic accident was caused during the repeated crime due to the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and that the two victims did not take any measures and fled is disadvantageous to the Defendant.

On the other hand, the following conditions are favorable.

Defendant reflects the instant crime.

At the original trial, the victims do not want punishment of the defendant by mutual consent between the victims and the victims.

The negligence of the Defendant and the victims conflict with each other, causing the instant traffic accident.

In many cases, the victims' injuries are relatively minor.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the circumstances leading up to the instant crime, the circumstances after the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment, and various sentencing conditions shown in the instant records and pleadings, the prosecutor’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow