1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 34,534,127 and the interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from October 31, 2017 to the date of full payment.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant subcontracted the panel construction to the Plaintiff as indicated in the following table:

(2) Each construction work shall be classified into “each of the instant construction works” and each of the instant construction works shall be classified into the name of the construction site. The construction works shall be classified into “each of the instant construction works.” At the end, Incheon D 2016-05-11 2016-06-04 15,400,000 Won Kimpo-2016-06-12-300,000 Won 2017-01-02 2017-02 2017-02-28, 35,300,000 Won for the first construction site for the construction site.

B. The Defendant sent to the Plaintiff, by facsimile, a statement of the balance in the following table for each of the instant construction works.

(hereinafter referred to as the “statement of entry in the balance of this case”). (The statement of entry in the balance of this case) The balance of the invoice of additional and settlement of contract amount D 15,400,000,000 17,050,000 15,400,650,000 1,650,000 Kimpo-si on the 36,700,000 on the 36,700,000 on the 16,951,400,000 on the 36,951,400,000 on the 36,000 on the 36,951,400,000 on the 15,000 on the 17,000,0003,060,0003,060,00132,160,401,401,527,371,

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. According to the statement on the balance sheet received from the Defendant, the Plaintiff sought payment of KRW 1,650,00,000, which is calculated by subtracting KRW 70,000,000, which was paid from KRW 777,000,00 corresponding to the part of the Plaintiff’s performance of the construction among the Kimpo E works, and KRW 34,127,27,127, which was paid out of KRW 56,951,40, which was paid out of KRW 56,951,40, which was paid by the Plaintiff among the final construction cost of the Friju Factory, and KRW 3,060,00,00 corresponding to the part of the Plaintiff’s performance of the construction of the G factories among the G factories, including KRW 34,534,127,127.

B. As seen earlier, the Plaintiff’s portion of the Incheon D D D D Corporation was proceeding with a subcontract from the Defendant. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in Gap evidence No. 2, the Plaintiff received an additional amount of KRW 1,650,000 at the Defendant’s request from the Defendant, and the Plaintiff’s installation of a back-to-date railer and its mobile installation for the said construction work.