1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A: 121,172,909 won and 1) 17,000,000 won, Defendant A shall be from February 8, 200 to 29,000.

1. The Plaintiff claims as indicated in the separate sheet and each of the changed causes of claims. The above facts of the assertion can be acknowledged by the respective entries and arguments in the evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3 between the Plaintiff and Defendant B, C, and D, and the Plaintiff and Defendant A did not appear on the date of pleading and submit a reply and other legal brief, so they shall be deemed to have been led to confession. Thus, the Defendants are obliged to pay the amount of money as indicated in the text.

2. Defendant B, C, and D asserted that they cannot accept the Plaintiff’s claim since they fully repaid their obligations to the Plaintiff through a compulsory auction on immovables. However, the Plaintiff claimed the remainder of the amount of claims recognized in this Court Decision 2005Gahap7301, excluding the amount repaid through the above compulsory auction, and it is insufficient to recognize that the evidence submitted by the above Defendants alone is sufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff’s claim was fully repaid. Thus, the above Defendants’ assertion is without merit.

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is accepted on the grounds of its reasoning.