logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2014.08.21 2014가단4416
관리비
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Grounds for the plaintiff's claim

A. The Plaintiff is responsible for the management of the building B in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant condominium building”).

B. At around 2003, the Defendant, under an agreement with Nonparty C, the representative of the 5th floor management body, occupied B-072, B-073, B-079, B-09, B-090, B-091, C-077, and C-095 of the instant aggregate building. The Defendant operated the provisional purchase office using the said units as follows.

C. As to the management expenses incurred during the Defendant’s use period, the term “principal of the unpaid management expenses” and “additional fees” as indicated below were generated, such as management expenses and late payment charges as indicated in each of the following:

The defendant D defendant (E) (E) who has agreed to pay unpaid real estate management fees from February 2008 to April 2008, 887,740 won B-7,740 won B-740 won from February 2008 to April 8, 2008, Defendant (E) who has agreed to pay the unpaid real estate management fees from 88,290 won to 88,290 won from February 2008, B-08, B-089 to April 2007, 1,508, 280 won from December 208, 308, 308, 408, 280 won from 40 to April 205, 208, 308, 308, 408, 205, 308, 408, 205, 208, 308, 307, 308, 2094.

D. Although the Defendant did not report the sale price to the Plaintiff or conclude a management contract with the Plaintiff, the Defendant is obligated to pay the management fee, etc. in accordance with the management agreement by falling under the lessee or occupant of the instant condominium building, and the Defendant was obligated to pay the unpaid management fee and late payment fee in March and April 2005, as the management fee was directly signed in the highest dispatch ledger of the management fee.

2. We examine the judgment, and even if the defendant occupied part of the aggregate building of this case for a certain period, the evidence submitted by the plaintiff alone.

arrow