1. The Defendant: (a) each of the KRW 2,00,000 for Plaintiff A and B; (b) KRW 1,000,000 for each of the KRW 1,000 for Plaintiff C and D; and (c) for each of the instant money on May 24, 2013.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The recognition 1) E is a F Passenger Car around 17:53 on May 24, 2013 (hereinafter “Defendant Passenger Car”).

)A person driving on, and driving on, a space Lyala apartment underground parking lot in the south-gu, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-do, along with the entrance from the inside side to the port of exit. During that, he shocked G entering and leaving the inside side of the exit to the bicycle (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”).

(2) Due to the instant accident, G suffered injury, such as leaving the left-hand side cutting.

3) The Defendant is an insurer who has entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract for the Defendant’s automobile. 4) The Plaintiff A and B are the parents of G, and the Plaintiff C and D are the subjects of G.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there is no dispute, Gap 1, 2, 6, 7, 8 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleading

B. The plaintiffs asserts that the accident of this case occurred due to negligence that caused the plaintiffs to compensate for the damages caused by the accident, since the driver of the vehicle in this case neglected the duty of the driver at the front side, was not bound by the access to the underground parking lot, and was caused by negligence that did not accelerate or stop even after discovering G.

In regard to this, the defendant asserts that the accident of this case occurred by negligence before G enters the underground parking lot in the reverse direction by using a exit exit, not the entrance of the underground parking lot, and did not bind the bicycle or take preventive measures against it, and that it cannot be deemed that it caused the negligence of the driver of the defendant vehicle. Thus, the defendant should be exempted from liability.

In particular, the defendant mentioned the official distance of the defendant's vehicle and the movement distance, and found that even if the driver of the defendant's vehicle finds G and operates it immediately, it is difficult to avoid the collision.

According to the G, the instant accident is not merely a shock of the G where the Defendant’s car was driven by, inter alia, the 22,26 pages).