The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. There are circumstances favorable to the defendant that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflected his mistake, that there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime, that the defendant seems to be not a criminal with professional exchange, and that the size of the exchange of this case is not large.

However, among the crimes in this case, the part of the crime in violation of the Foreign Exchange Transactions Act is a crime that undermines the effectiveness of national policies aimed at properly controlling foreign exchange transactions and stabilizing monetary value, and the part of the transfer of the means of electronic financial transactions may be abused as a means of illegal monetary transactions. The nature of the crime is not less than that of causing secondary damage because it has been abused for other serious crimes, and the means of access transferred by the defendant seems to have been actually used for additional crimes such as the crime in this case, etc., disadvantageous circumstances to the defendant, such as the motive and background leading up to the crime in this case, the frequency and period of the crime in violation of the Foreign Exchange Transactions Act, the number of the crimes in this case, the period and scale of the crimes in this case, the circumstances before and after the crime, the defendant's age, character and conduct, occupation, occupation, occupation, and family relationship, etc., the defendant's assertion of this dispute is rejected

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.