The judgment below

Among the parts against Defendant D, the part against the Plaintiff and the remaining parts against the Defendants are reversed, and this is applicable.

The grounds of appeal are examined (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed).

1. Review of the reasoning of the lower judgment and the record reveals the following facts.

In the case of the Busan High Court 2009Na11501, 11518, 11525, 11525, 11532, 11549, 11563, 11570 (combined), 115556 (Consolidated), which is the appellate court of the lawsuit filed by the buyer of the apartment of this case or the person who succeeded to the status of the buyer from the buyer of the apartment of this case against the plaintiff and the previous buyer of the apartment of this case, the Busan High Court announced the plaintiff and the seller of the sale order of this case to the extent that the sale order's first sale order's act belongs to the act of deceiving or misleading consumers, and the sale order of this case's advertisement of this case's apartment of this case's apartment of this case's case's violation of fair trade order's fair sale order' and the plaintiff and the seller of this case's first sale order's violation of the duty of damages compensation or unfair sale order' 10.

(hereinafter referred to as the "relevant case") b. Busan High Court 2009Na11501.

In this regard, some of the plaintiffs in related cases are Supreme Court Decision 2012Da15336, 15343, 15350, 15367, 15377, 15374, 15381, 15398, 15398.