logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2015.02.12 2013가단507910
배당이의
Text

1. In the case of application for the auction of the auction of real estate deposit, the above court on August 2013, 201, in the J, K, and L (Joint) of the J, K (Joint), and L (Dual) of the J,

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. In order to secure claims against M Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “M”) and N, the Industrial Bank of Korea acquired each of the secured claims worth KRW 600,000,000,000 from the maximum debt amount on December 16, 2005, the maximum debt amount on September 29, 2006, and KRW 1.2 billion on April 28, 2008.

B. On December 5, 2011, the Industrial Bank of Korea applied for a voluntary auction on the instant secured real estate; the procedure of the voluntary auction was initiated by the JJ for Goyang Branch of the District Court; on March 6, 2012, the Plaintiff acquired each of the instant secured mortgage claims from the Industrial Bank of Korea.

C. The same court K Voluntary Auction procedure was combined with the above auction procedure, and the auction procedure was initiated in duplicate with L of the same court.

The auction court held that the amount of KRW 4,308,445,973 to be distributed on August 19, 2013 was KRW 3,518,830, KRW 430 to the Plaintiff who is the wage obligee, KRW 4,39,760, KRW 6,785,040 to the Plaintiff C, KRW 8,873,010, KRW 4307, KRW 4300 to the Plaintiff E, KRW 6,524,645, KRW 3,925,250 to the Plaintiff, KRW 7,885,90 to the Plaintiff, KRW 2,818,866, and KRW 8,90 to the Plaintiff who is the wage obligee to the wage obligee, KRW 6,785,00, KRW 839,90 to the Plaintiff, who is the wage obligee to the P, KRW 5,873,00, KRW 3981,8498.

E. On the aforementioned date of distribution, the Plaintiff stated an objection against the total amount of dividends to the Defendants, and thereafter filed a lawsuit of demurrer against distribution on August 26, 2013, within one week from the said date.

[Reasons for Recognition: Evidence A (including partial number, hereinafter the same shall apply) Nos. 1 through 6, 18, 19

(2) 【Each entry】

2. The Plaintiff’s assertion that Defendant A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I and P work in Q (title N, actual representative R) or M (representative).

arrow