logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2021.03.11 2020고단6313
모욕등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. In a restaurant located in Daegu Suwon-gu B on August 4, 2020, the Defendant: (a) sent to the site after receiving a report from 112 that “the victim D, the police officer belonging to the Daegu Suwon-gu Police Station C District,” and “E, the customer who scambling scams scams,” and (b) received a large number of restaurant customers and employees, who are the said victims; (c) whether the said victims were hambling; (d) whether the instant police scams, spams, and scams.

좆 빤다고 왔냐,

The victims were openly insultingd by referring to this Chewing Chewingly.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, and assaulted the Defendant, who was a police officer belonging to the Daegu Suhyup Police Station C District, out of the restaurant, by cutting the Defendant under the influence of alcohol out of the restaurant, thereby leaving the restaurant, and blusium D’s chest due to blus.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or E;

1. A complaint;

1. Notification related to the 112 Reporting Department, and the application of statutes governing the C District Work Site;

1. Selection of each of the fines provided for in Articles 311 of the Criminal Act and Articles 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime at issue;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the Defendant’s fault in sentencing is not less than that of the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the punishment as ordered is determined by considering the following: (a) the Defendant’s fault is against the Defendant; (b) the Defendant’s age, environment; (c) the means and consequence of the commission of the crime (the degree of intimidation and assault) and the circumstances after the commission of the crime; and (d) the Defendant’s age, environment; and (e) there

arrow