logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2021.01.19 2020고단1053
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Since the defendant is led to confession, he/she must make an additional statement on the same part as that of the evidence for reinforcement in the same way as “(see, e.g., the page of evidence record).”

Based on evidence, the prosecutor's facts charged are modified to the extent that it does not adversely affect the defendant's right of defense and actually affect the contents of the facts charged, and it does not result in the change of the subject of the trial by the court.

On September 21, 2020, the Defendant driven a F-winged and III vehicle over a section of about 1km from the front of the Food in Chuncheon City to the front of the "E" road located in Chuncheon City D, under the influence of alcohol content of 0.089% (see, e.g., evidence record) among the blood transfusions around 21:35 (see, e.g., the fourth page).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquire about the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (3) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the Defendant’s reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order was longer prior to the full amendment of the Road Traffic Act, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1,500,000 for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Chuncheon District Court on February 17, 2005 (see, e.g., evidence No. 12,29 of the Act), and again, committed a crime of driving under the same kind of drinking, which is the same kind of crime (see, e.g., evidence No. 12, 29th).

It is difficult to see it.

In light of this, the defendant's responsibility is heavy.

may be filed.

On the other hand, however, the fact that the defendant of the Do governor was aware of the crime of this case, and there was no record of punishment in excess of the Do governor's fine, and there was no record of punishment after 2006, and the above sealed and III cars used for the crime of this case after the crime of this case were transferred and disposed of (see the Motor Vehicle Registration Register attached to the trial record on December 3, 2020).

arrow