beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Of the facts charged of this case, the prosecution against assault is dismissed.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On June 26, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor by obstructing the performance of official duties at the Suwon Friwon, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on October 3, 2015. On February 19, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with prison labor due to an injury, etc. in the Suwon Friwon Friwon Friwon Friwon Friwon Friwon Friwon, and the judgment became final and conclusive on May 18, 2016.
1. Interference with performing public duties;
A. (1) On January 4, 2016, the Defendant: (a) threatened the Defendant with 741 chemical training institution D’s lower-class accommodation room in the fluent vocational training institution D, a fluent vocational training institution of 10:35 on the ground that: (b) the Defendant instructed C to “A fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluencing fluent fluencing flus,” and obstructed C’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the patrol of the living room by assaulting C’s chest fluent fluent at his left hand by assaulting C twice the fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluen.
(2) On January 4, 2016, at around 12:15, the Defendant: (a) threatened the Defendant at the lower accommodation of the foregoing prison D, and obstructed C’s lawful performance of duties concerning the management of prisoners by threatening the Defendant, on the ground that the Defendant ordered C to remove the Defendant from a video safe equipment (CCTV) in his/her ward, “I am kneed knee-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-k
B. On January 4, 2016, at around 11:00, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties to E, on the ground that he instructed the Defendant to the effect that “I will faithfully live in prison according to the direction of the worker in charge,” the Defendant, who is in exclusive charge of the grievance settlement counseling service, sent the Defendant a warning to E, “I will give a warning to E, I will not talk only from the employee’s position, I would like to go off, I would like to go against the inside of E, who was worn by E, and to go to drinking E.