beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant, around 03:30 on October 24, 2013, was in Silri-si H. “I” at the same drinking house, and the Defendant, at the place of business, she was in drinking as a mixed customer with the J’s occupation.
The victim K (n, 42 years of age), a social partner of J, who had been living in frighting, brought about the order of the defendant, she saw that he she was frighted by putting his hand in the clothes under the part below the part of the victim's body, and she was frighted to say that she was fright to her, and that she was fright to her, she was fright to her, and she was fright to her, and she was fright to her, and she was frighted by force by force.
Summary of Evidence
1. Legal statement of K witness K;
1. Each police statement to K and J;
1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes of J and L;
1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 298 of the Criminal Act regarding the crime, the choice of a fine (see, e.g., that the victim does not want the punishment of the accused by agreement with the victim, and that the accused does not have any criminal power except once a fine is
1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. Article 16 (2) and (3) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed to Order;
1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;
1. The defendant and his/her defense counsel's assertion regarding the punishment, etc. of sexual crimes exempt from disclosure and notification of personal information, the proviso to Article 49 (1) and the proviso to Article 50 (1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (which does not disclose and notify personal information in consideration of family relation, personal situation, etc.). The defendant and his/her defense counsel asserted that the defendant met at the time of the crime of this case and there is no memory about the crime of this case, and that he/she made physical contact with employees by misunderstanding the victim as a drinking employee to a certain extent, and that he/she did not have the intent of indecent act by force.
Each of the above.