A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was aware of while living in Korea with the victim B.

1. On July 19, 2016, when the defrauded borrowed money, the Defendant borrowed money to the victim in the residence of the victim in the Gangseo-gun C of Gangwon-gu around July 19, 2016, “If the victim suffers from cancer and did not pay the surgery expenses and hospitalization expenses, 8 million won will be repaid later.

“A false representation was made.”

However, the defendant did not have any kind of relationship with cancer, and there was no reason to receive insurance money, and even if he borrowed money from the victim, he thought to be used as personal debt, living expenses, etc., but did not have any intention or ability to repay it to the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above and received KRW 8 million in cash and check from the victim on the same day; and (b) from that time until July 29, 2016, the Defendant acquired the total sum of KRW 11 million through three times in the same manner as the one in the one in the one in the attached crime list from July 29, 2016.

2. On September 3, 2016, the Defendant shall purchase only food materials of KRW 300,000,00,000, from the victim’s residence as stated in paragraph (1) around September 3, 201, and return money to the victim.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, the Defendant purchased only 300,000 won goods that the Defendant promised to receive a credit card from the injured party and did not intend to return them to the injured party, and was thought to continue to use them until the injured party demanded return. The personal debt was equivalent to 700 to 80 million won, and at the time, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to complete payment of the credit card use fee due to the Defendant’s difficulty in operating the restaurant.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and is issued a new credit card owned by the defendant on the same day from the victim.