1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

Claim:

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation on the instant case is as follows, except for adding a judgment on the Defendant’s argument in the trial, and therefore, it is identical to the entry of the reasoning of the judgment in the first instance. Therefore, it is cited under Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

【Additional Judgment】 The Defendant asserts that the Defendant’s joint and several liability owed to the Plaintiff on November 11, 2008 (hereinafter “instant liability”) was repaid and extinguished as follows.

In other words, while the defendant leased and resided in the apartment complex No. 112, 306, 112, and 306, which is owned by the defendant, the plaintiff purchased the above apartment in the amount of KRW 288,000,000 and agreed to cover the deposit amount of KRW 20,000,000 as the defendant's deposit for the above apartment. This constitutes a case where the defendant transferred the above claim to the plaintiff for the repayment of the debt of this case, thereby, the defendant's debt against the plaintiff was extinguished by the repayment, and the claim for the above is contrary to the principle of nopoly, or the principle of trust and good faith.

However, in full view of the above statements in Eul evidence Nos. 6 through 9 (including paper numbers), the point of time of the defendant's above assertion, and the purport of the argument and the whole arguments in the court of first instance, which the defendant's mother, as a representative of the defendant, leased the above apartment from E in the capacity of the defendant, with a deposit of KRW 20 million, monthly rent of KRW 900,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,0000,000,0000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won.