beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and for two years, respectively.
However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant A.
Reasons
(b) A attempted to defraud 265,000,000 won as material price by deceiving A, but it did not come to a attempted attempt by A but did not come to the wind to refuse payment.
Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving A, obtained a total of 321,750,000 won owned by the victim company, and attempted to obtain a total of 265,00,000 won, but attempted to commit an attempted crime.
2. The Defendants came to know that Hyundai Construction Co-Defendant paid the construction cost of L 1 phase 2 construction to the victim K in the Dispute Resolution and that it would pay additional construction cost as of March 22, 2012.
Accordingly, the Defendants, around March 21, 2012, set forth the method of settling the price accounts between Defendant B and Defendant A in the office of Defendant A, which is located in the Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd., and set forth the method of settling the accounts for the transfer and takeover of the K K in the K in charge of the settlement of accounts between Defendant B and Defendant A.
proceeds of sale of a corporation: 250 million won;
(b)construction cost: 400 million won;
(c) The details of the settlement amount: 276,052,018 (Additional Reference)* The settlement shall be made on March 23, 2012;
As to the method of calculating the settlement amount of KRW 276,052,018, Defendant B attached a summary of the sales amount of KRW 650,000,000,000,000,000,000 paid to Defendant A, which is KRW 50,000,000,000,000 for intermediate payment, KRW 50,000,000,000 for intermediate payment, KRW 87,968,465,00,000 for intermediate payment, KRW 275,627,07,00,000 for construction payment, and KRW 68,739,39,390,00 for other settlement, and KRW 120,908,00 for the Mutual Aid Association (Contributions) to the settlement amount to be paid by Defendant A to Defendant A by means of a public offering to acquire the funds of Defendant B to the victim corporation in the course of business operation.
Therefore, the defendant A, on March 23, 2012, deposited by Hyundai Construction Co., Ltd. into the bank account in the name of the victim company.