1. The original copy of an executory deed No. 2017No. 15, written by the Defendant against C in South-North General Law Firm.

1. In full view of each of the statements in subparagraphs 1 through 7 of the basic facts, the Plaintiff and the couple are the Plaintiff, and the Defendant, based on the executory exemplification of notarial deeds No. 2017No. 15 prepared by the Nambu General Law Firm, on May 11, 2017, based on the executory exemplification of notarial deeds No. 2015, May 11, 2017, by the Suwon District Court No. 2017No. 2622 as to each of the corporeal movables listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant compulsory execution”).

2. The plaintiff asserts that the compulsory execution of this case by the defendant is unfair, since each corporeal movable property listed in the separate sheet is purchased by the plaintiff and owned by the plaintiff.

In full view of the purport of the entire arguments as seen earlier, the corporeal movables listed in paragraph (1) among each of the corporeal movables listed in the separate sheet are the facilities listed in D, 501, which were leased by the Plaintiff, and each of the corporeal movables listed in the separate sheet, 6, 7, 8, and 9, among each of the corporeal movables listed in the separate sheet, shall have been purchased by the Plaintiff and paid the purchase price. However, there is no evidence to support that the Plaintiff acquired the ownership of each corporeal movables listed in the separate sheet 4, 50,

Therefore, among the corporeal movables listed in the separate sheet, each corporeal movables listed in the separate sheet shall be deemed as holding by the plaintiff or having the right to prevent delivery by the plaintiff. Therefore, the defendant's execution of the above corporeal movables shall be dismissed.

3. The plaintiff's claim of this case is justified within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claim is dismissed as it is without merit.