logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.04.07 2014고단2309
상해
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 1,500,000, and by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants came to know at the “G” senior citizen center in Seo-gu, Daejeon.

1. At around 11:20 on March 4, 2014, Defendant A: (a) was released from the center for older persons; (b) was released from the center for older persons; and (c) the victim H (the 89 years of age) and the son B, who were children; and (d) was in the center for older persons; (b) was punished by the above B and the kneb; (c) the victim was forced to kne his knee his kne in his kne and to knee his kne in his kne in his kne; and (d) the victim was forced to kne his kne in his kne in his kne and knee his kne in his kne in his kne and kne in his kne in his kne

2. Defendant B, at the above date, and at the above time and place, the victim A (V, 64 years old) committed an assault against the Defendant’s mother, and the victim was under pressured 3 times to give approximately 12 weeks of treatment to the victim, and the victim was under pressured 12 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

Defendant

A

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Each legal statement of a witness I, J and H;

1. Partial statement of the witness B;

1. Statement to the prosecution of the defendant A concerning the interrogation of the suspect (including cross-examination);

1. Statement of the police statement related H;

1. Defendant B of the medical certificate of injury (H);

1. Defendant B’s partial statement

1. A witness I and each legal statement of the J;

1. Partial statement of the witness A;

1. Statement to the prosecution of the defendant A concerning the interrogation of the suspect (including cross-examination);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate (A);

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The defendant A asserts that the judgment on each of the defendants' arguments in Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Code was made only against himself, and that there was no fact at the time of the victim. However, in full view of the location, form, degree of the victim's injury, witness's statement, etc., the defendant A's above assertion cannot be accepted, since the defendant A's crime of this case can be sufficiently recognized.

On the other hand.

arrow