Defendant shall be punished by a fine of nine million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant and B, in collusion with the Defendant, agreed to import and lease a middle and high-class workshop, and the aged should make a false registration of the production year for reasons that it is not easy for the rental business. A.

In collusion with the Defendant and B on June 2016, at the night site of “C” in Incheon, the Defendant and B engaged in the fabrication of private documents and the display of the falsified document: (a) with respect to the DNA (E) imported from Korea, the Defendant had the intention to produce and attach a name plate as if it were a type of other workshops that have not been produced for a long time; (b) forged a name tag by requesting the Defendant and the inferer to produce a name plate in 2013 and 2013 and 16. (c) On June 13, 2016, at the vehicle registration office located in the Dong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, the Defendant and B used the forged name tag by presenting a third person with the above name tag affixed, which was forged to the inspector.

Accordingly, the defendant and B conspired to forge the name plates of G company name, which are private documents related to certification of fact, and exercised them.

B. On June 13, 2016, the Defendant and B, in collusion, to enter false electromagnetic records, etc., and to enter false electromagnetic records, etc., the foregoing B, at the vehicle registration office located in the Incheon Dong-gu Office, Incheon.

In fact, the above worker had been manufactured from G company in 2005. However, as if it had been reported in 2013 and issued by Busan Customs office, the above worker applied for registration of construction machinery to the above worker by using the certificate of import certificate issued by the Busan Customs, and had the public official in charge who was unaware of the fact enter the manufacturing process of the other worker into the construction machinery management information system of electronic records as if it was 2013.

Accordingly, the defendant and B conspired to make false reports to public officials to record false facts in public electronic records.