logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.12.27 2015가단33762
한정채무부존재확인
Text

1. The G Hospital for the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff in the course of filing an application for participation by an independent party intervenor (Counterclaim Defendant);

Reasons

A principal lawsuit, counterclaim, application for intervention by an independent party and a counterclaim against them shall be deemed to be filed together.

1. Basic facts

A. (1) On June 20, 2013, H Bus No. 1, which the Defendant was on board, caused an accident that conflicts with Benz vehicles during the course of driving in a locking room from the sub-committee on June 20, 2013 (attached Form No. 2, and hereinafter referred to as “instant primary accident”).

2) At the time of the accident, the Defendant was on board the front seat of the bus. However, at the time of the instant accident, the bus was faced with the front seat of the Defendant’s head, shoulder, and dust while operating the bus rapidly. (2) On the date of the instant first accident, the Defendant was diagnosed with the left-hand side salt, fluoral seat, fluoral seat, fluoral seat, fluoral seat, and fluoral seat, left-hand side and left-hand side of the bus, the left-hand side and the left-hand side, the lower-hand side and the left-hand side of the bus, and was diagnosed.

3) An independent party intervenor is the insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with respect to the above bus. (B) On September 24, 2014, the Plaintiff was driving a KK (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) around 08:50 on September 24, 2014, and received the back portion of the Defendant’s passenger vehicle that was proceeding earlier at the time while driving in the Olympic Games located in Songpa-dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul.

(As an accident listed in paragraph (1) of the attached Table 1, the Defendant was diagnosed by the M Hospital located in Guri-si on the date of the second accident of this case (hereinafter “the second accident of this case”). (3) The Plaintiff’s assistant intervenor is an insurer who concluded an automobile liability insurance contract with respect to the Plaintiff’s vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1, 3 through 9, purport of the whole pleadings

2. In the case of an independent party intervenor's application for intervention, the benefit of confirmation in the lawsuit for confirmation as to the legal relationship that the examination of the defendant is irrelevant to the primary accident of this case.

arrow