The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The court below rendered a judgment dismissing the prosecutor’s request regarding the part of the defendant’s case and the part of the case for which the request for the attachment order was filed, and there is no benefit of appeal regarding the part for which the request for the attachment order was filed.

Therefore, notwithstanding Article 9 (8) of the Act on Probation and Electronic Monitoring of Specific Criminal Offenders, the part regarding the request for attachment order is excluded from the scope of the trial of this court.

2. The summary of the grounds for appeal (12 years of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. The judgment appears to have led to the instant crime under the influence of alcohol; the Defendant has no record of crime except for a fine imposed once due to driving under influence of alcohol; the Defendant voluntarily reported the instant crime to 112 and voluntarily surrendered; and the Defendant seriously reflected the mistake of the Defendant is favorable to the Defendant.

However, the crime of this case, however, was committed by the defendant who escaped from North Korea after marriage in North Korea and took a telephone call with another male who has maintained the marriage life in the Republic of Korea, and was committed with the victim's chest and ship with the kitchen knife on the ground that the victim's chest and ship with the kitchen knife were killed, and the result of the crime is very significant and is also harsh.

The murder crime cannot be used for any reason, which results in deducting the life of the person who is the most valuable value that cannot be altered.

The victim, in the state of the knife, knifeed the defendant's knife on the knife, and knife the defendant's life under extreme pain.

In addition, immediately after the crime of this case was committed, the knife or her mother was slicked by her father with a knife at knife.