The defendant shall be exempted from punishment.

Punishment of the crime

On August 31, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud in the loan support of Suwon Friwon, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 19, 2016.

On July 26, 2016, the Defendant received food equivalent to KRW 8,00 per square meter, KRW 2-6,000 per square meter, KRW 2-6,00 per square meter, and KRW 14,00 per square meter (a total of KRW 14,00) from the injured party, even though he/she did not have an intent or ability to pay the price in the “D” of the victim C Operation D, which is located in Guri-si B, Sin-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. C’s statement;

1. Previous convictions: Application of one copy of the previous convictions and results of confirmation, and a copy of the judgment;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 347 of the choice of punishment;

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. In full view of the following circumstances: (a) the reasons for sentencing under the latter part of Article 39(1) of the Exempted Criminal Act; and (b) the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, method and mode of committing a crime; and (c) the circumstances before and after committing a crime, etc., the sentence shall be determined as ordered by the Disposition.

- The fact that there is no significant reflect and fraud amount, and that there is no difference between the case and the case of determining fraud in the criminal facts stated in the judgment.