logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.02.03 2016고단5037
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months;

2. Provided, That with respect to Defendant S, it shall be applicable.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. From January 2016, Defendant A, in violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Arrangement, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts (i.e., brokerage of commercial sex acts), was willing to arrange commercial sex acts against customers who find the said business place, who leased four studio rooms in North-gu, Gwangju, Gwangju, and employed female employees.

Defendant

A from January 2, 2016 to May 2016, 2016, after receiving 80,000 won from his or her nameless customers, A provided guidance to the relevant heading room, and let female employees do a similar sexual intercourse that helps them look into the sexual organ of the customer and look at the sexual organ of the customer.

As a result, Defendant A arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

B. On May 2016, Defendant A, who violated the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging sexual traffic (such as brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic), received the above “F” from Defendant S, who was around the middle of May 2016, and was asked to take over and operate the above “F” and provided a list of customers with knowledge that Defendant S would take over the above key room and engage in commercial sex acts, thereby making it easier for Defendant S to commit the crime by allowing Defendant S to take over the above 4 room and four female employees at around that time, and providing a list of customers.

(c)

The owner of a business place harmful to juveniles in violation of the Juvenile Protection Act shall not employ a juvenile, and where he/she intends to employ an employee, he/she shall verify the age in advance.

Nevertheless, on March 2016, Defendant A employed Defendant A as an employee without confirming the age of “F” as a juvenile X (W, 16 years of age at that time) from the said “F,” and employed Defendant A as an employee without confirming the age of “F” as a juvenile Y (W, 18 years of age at that time) in April 2016.

As a result, Defendant A employed a juvenile without confirming his age as the business owner of a juvenile harmful business establishment.

2. Defendant SA.

arrow