The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

On October 17, 2012, around 10:30 on October 17, 2012, the Defendant requested the victim D’s roof eaves to be fladal from spring, which is difficult for the victim to go beyond the boundary of his house wall, and damaged another’s property, such as where the victim’s roof bed up with the victim’s roof through his house roof, and where the victim did not dispose of it, he did not dispose of it, thereby damaging another’s property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Article 36 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Fine of 300,000 won to be suspended;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the primary offender, the roof of the house owned by the victim appears to have caused the crime in order to eliminate damage therefrom beyond the Defendant’s house boundary, and the amount of damage is not large) of the suspended sentence (i.e., the Defendant and the defense counsel’s assertion as to the assertion and determination thereof by the Defendant and the defense counsel, and the Defendant and the defense counsel, who have been well aware of the roof with the consent of the victim, and thus, the Defendant’s act did not constitute innocence because the Defendant had been aware of the roof with the consent of the victim even without the consent of the victim. However, considering witness D’s testimony and the process in which the victim reported